Abstract
Analyses around the process of
constitution of the legal environment of organizations are of great importance
for organizational studies because, through the use of concepts such as:
endogeneity and institutionalization, as well as other contributions from (neo)
Institutionalism, it is possible that we break with the belief somewhat
ingrained, in the more traditional academic circles, around a supposed
erogeneity of laws, by organizations and legal systems. And, as we will try to
demonstrate, in concrete terms, we observe the prevalence of endogenous models,
given the valorisation of technical mechanisms that are adjusted, in view of
legal requirements, in favour of the subsequent convalidation of greater
institutional legitimacy. In view of this scenario, there is, in parallel, a
gap around a deepening of the internal mechanisms and external pressures that
cause organizations to be affected by endogenous practices, a process that will
also be encompassed. Therefore, in methodological terms, we opted for a critical
review of the classical (neo)institutionalist literature, and during the
studies, it was noticed that this epistemology presents advances in
organizational studies because it departs from the functionalist logic, still
excessively based on logic: pressures x responses, while seeing organizations
being linked to two environments: technical and institutional. Moreover, the
(neo)institutionalist perspective envisions endogenous practices from a broader
perspective, conceiving them via a multicausal reading, factors that enhance
such epistemology, whose uses should be valued even more by academia and the
market.
-Today |
157 |
 -Yesterday |
278 |
 -This Month |
21150 |
 -Last Month |
24473 |
 -All Days |
225706 |
IJBMS by IPRPD is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.